As some of you will be aware, there's an
online (UK) petition to broaden the definition of hate crimes in the wake of
Sophie Lancaster's death.
Personally, I have to say that I'm unconvinced by the concept of hate crime laws. Not just in this case, but generally. On the other hand, I don't actually have any facts and figures about this to hand - it's just a vague unease.
I'm sure someone out there knows rather more than I do, though. So...
- Are they effective when a case comes to court?
- Do they actually make a difference as a deterrent?
- Should two similar crimes be treated differently depending on what motivated them - should the courts treat a completely random attack differently from a hate crime...?
I know this is a very emotive subject - and I do want to see the people responsible for this sort of attack jailed for a very long time. But is this the best way to do that? Are the existing laws sufficient - or do they need strengthening in other ways...?