mrph: (Anubis)
[personal profile] mrph
Remember the Fox News opinion piece that attacked Gilligan and the BBC, pretty much implying that the BBC had been pro-Baghdad during the invasion of Iraq? (It was available as video online, and got linked from several LJs).

Well, OFCOM has just finished investigating and has found Fox to be in breach of British broadcasting rules - in particular, the "respect for truth" and "opinions expressed must not rest upon false evidence" sections of the code.

http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1239094,00.html

Date: 2004-06-15 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taoist-goth.livejournal.com
What I want to know is, given that Fox were in breach of guidelines, what are the reparations?

Date: 2004-06-15 03:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrph.livejournal.com
Yeah. I'd wondered about that bit...

Date: 2004-06-15 03:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taoist-goth.livejournal.com
It seems to happen so often that someone is found to have broken the rules, but then nothing is done to either punish them nor prevent it from happening again. No wonder people have no feckin' respect any more. Fox should be fined heavily and put on probation under penalty of having their UK broadcasting licence revoked.

Profile

mrph: (Default)
mrph

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2026 10:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios