mrph: (Default)
[personal profile] mrph
Bradford & Bingley is to be nationalised - "the Treasury will almost instantaneously sell to a bank or a number of banks".

According to the BBC, this means that every building society floated on the stock market in the past two decades will have collapsed or been sold to a conventional bank. Something about that fact seems a little bit depressing.



Date: 2008-09-28 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_gh0st_/
agh! cheers for the news flash. Our mortgage is with Mortgage Express who are B&B. wonder what'll happen!

Date: 2008-09-28 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] livingarmchair.livejournal.com
I think the mortgage business is what is being nationalised, as this is where the toxic debt is. The other areas will be sold off.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-28 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-ant.livejournal.com
I doubt they will fail.
IMHO, they are still mutual, so unless they have been badly mannaged (significantly more lending than deposits, or a high proportion of very risky lending) they should be big enough to ride it out.

That said - who knows :-).

Date: 2008-09-28 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mimmimmim.livejournal.com
Suffering for greed, perhaps? If they'd stayed mutual, maybe they wouldn't have got in quite such a mess.

That said, there have been small building societies taken over by banks in the past couple of weeks - they've been on the verge of going to the wall and larger, stable companies have been leaned on to take them over before they collapse.

Date: 2008-09-28 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-ant.livejournal.com
AFAIK, The 2 small building societies merged with (were taken over by) the Nationwide - which is still mutual (a building society not a bank).

Date: 2008-09-29 08:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mimmimmim.livejournal.com
Yeah, I was confused by that. I thought they were a bank now.

Date: 2008-09-28 10:15 am (UTC)
zotz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zotz
Not terribly surprising, though. It was always a short-termist strategy.

Date: 2008-09-28 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-ant.livejournal.com
I suspect that the reason the demutualised societies have failed is that it was only the smaller societies that fell victim to 'carpet bagging' and hence demutualisation - because they are still small they fell. Nationwide (and some others) was much bigger than average and this bought it enough time to ammend its rules before the carpet baggers got it. It now has rules to protect it from such action (up to a point).

Date: 2008-09-28 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hex61.livejournal.com
Hmmm... I'm not sure I understand the structure of a "building society" but they look a lot like Savings and Loans we had in the US and which exploded a while back for us.

Date: 2008-09-29 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhw.livejournal.com
Similar kind of thing, yes. Basically they started out as mortgage companies, then more recently have diversified into being pesudobanks.

Date: 2008-09-29 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhw.livejournal.com
*shrug* Economies are turbulent objects, prone to all kinds of boom and bust, Adam Smith notwithstanding.

Profile

mrph: (Default)
mrph

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 01:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios