mrph: (cold)
[personal profile] mrph
That's that, then. Perhaps I'm being pessimistic, but I've just read the reports on Blair's latest speech -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2652033.stm

So, if any country applies an "unreasonable or unilateral" block at the UN, the UK will carry on and join the USA taking action against Iraq. To me that sounds very much like "if we lose the vote, or if any of the permanent members use their veto, we'll carry on regardless...". Also see the quote from Richard Perle, basically saying that the Weapons Inspectors don't matter - we know they won't find anything (because the weapons are hidden, of course), so the results of their search are irrelevant.

It's not much consolation that Blair will potentially lose his job if he takes that route, is it?

Date: 2003-01-13 11:58 am (UTC)
diffrentcolours: (Default)
From: [personal profile] diffrentcolours
Why would he lose his job? He's saving British lives by stopping Saddam, fighting the Axis of Evil and furthering the causes of freedom, justice and democracy... or at least, that's how Joe Public will see it. People may be a little wary of war right now, but when they're parading Saddam's head on a spike and have suddenly found shiteloads of nuclear weapons in the desert that the UN inspectors must have "missed", we'll be bending over for him to ass-rape us...

Profile

mrph: (Default)
mrph

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 10:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios