Page Summary
mrph.livejournal.com - (no subject)
adamw - (no subject)
flavius-m.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nils.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lurkingcat - (no subject)
karohemd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zotz - (no subject)
karohemd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
razornet.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wechsler.livejournal.com - (no subject)
scaryj.livejournal.com - (no subject)
aoakley.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jruske.livejournal.com - (no subject)
blu-matt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kiaransalyn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 10:44 am (UTC)(Look out for my post shortly for more on all this...)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 10:45 am (UTC)Who the hell is that person, anyway?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 10:50 am (UTC)*Falls over laughing*
Oh dear. Who the heck is he?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 11:16 am (UTC)In other news, I seem to have accidentally registered with Yahoo(!?) simply to give it a disrecommendation. Most of it's just flamebait, but miscounting the number of years since '97 really is a howler.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 02:24 pm (UTC)I laughed at that, too, if he can't get a simple and well recorded fact like that right, how are you supposed to believe anything else he says?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 03:44 pm (UTC)What a total fuckwit.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 07:32 pm (UTC)However, if the point was altered to a much less viciferous "The BBC teach us to be ashamed of English heritage far more often than they celebrate it" then I would agree. Note my specific and deliberate use of English rather than British.
There is a problem with the cultural mix of presenters and journalists - it is very far from a fair reflection of the cultural mix of the UK. They seem to massively favour presenters and journalists with a London-centric or Edinburgh-centric cosmopolitan background. For instance, there are no distinctly Brummie, Liverpudlian, Mancunian, Geordie or Bristolian announcers on Radio 4, however there are a number of distinctly Scottish announcers, and even one heavily distinct Jamaican announcer (although to be fair he is on stand-in loan from the World Service). Indeed, the BBC's flagship news programme, The Today Programme, is usually chaired by a Welshman and a Scot, despite it usually discussing only English politics.
My question, though, is whether this is an agenda led by the BBC, or the BBC led by an agenda originating elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-12 07:46 pm (UTC)I made the mistake of protesting in class abot 15 minutes into the lecture, but luckily it wasn't the current facist public school system currently in place in the USA, so I was simply asked to wait in the hall so the rest of the students could be indoctrinated before they figured out the word reversal. (Currently I'm pretty sure the public school system would have demanded I be medicated or otherwise restrained and contained for being disruptive by asking questions like "Why?" and demanding an explanation for "How?"
But I don't see the school system or the media for being to blame. I see the families and communities. The school system and media are third parties - they provide what they provide. It is up to the family and the community to dispell the stupidity, to explain, to teach critical thinking.
If you depend on a bureaucracy or a business to teach critical thinking... then you are a fool.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 05:47 am (UTC)I like that word: fucktard.
no subject