"No 10 denies reports that Gordon Brown has asked Tony Blair to step aside. More soon..."
Well now. Could be shaping up into an awfully interesting day in politics. I'm quite prepared to believe that no, Brown didn't.
But the fact that it's viewed as a possibility warranting (a seemingly unprompted) denial makes Blair look a little shakier. And then some.
Well now. Could be shaping up into an awfully interesting day in politics. I'm quite prepared to believe that no, Brown didn't.
But the fact that it's viewed as a possibility warranting (a seemingly unprompted) denial makes Blair look a little shakier. And then some.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 09:22 am (UTC)But Labour could. Especially as it's Blair, personally, who's seen as GWB's poodle. A new leader would be able to say "well, things have changed..." and would have a bit more room to manouver.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 09:40 am (UTC)Cheap media tricks. As far as they're concerned everyone's guilty un
lesstil proven innocent, at which point they generally forget they said anything.no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 09:43 am (UTC)I don't know that he'd be able to succesfully pull off a leadership challenge, but you're absolutely right, Blair is the focus rather than the party itself. Its not as if there is a credible alternative, after all.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-29 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-30 01:58 am (UTC)As it stands, I think there are people concerned (and not normal people like you an me etc) that this is going to blow into a ful world war - what with Tony stating that after Iraq has been 'dealt' with, they'll be sorting out North Korea...like they're just going to sit there and take that
I hope some one does challenge Tony, because no one can bodge it any worse than it already is.
Remember the paraoia I was talking about not so long ago...
The winter of Discontent rolls on :D